Showing posts with label surgery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label surgery. Show all posts

Monday, February 22, 2010

Breast Implant Surgery Through the Belly Button




Breast implant surgery through the belly button is one of the most exciting developments since the original breast augmentation procedure. This surgical technique allows patients to circumvent the most common patient complaint, which is surely the possibility of postoperative scarring common to every other kind of implant placement surgery. Undergoing breast enlargement using a naval incision does have its drawbacks and limitations, but offers patients an alternative approach which is sure to satisfy many of their concerns about the augmentation process.

The technical medical name for this operation is transumbilical breast augmentation, often abbreviated TUBA. The procedure utilizes a small, completely hidden incision inside the natural folds of the belly button to gain entry to the breast tissue for implant placement. There are no visible incisions made anywhere in the anatomy and there will be no definitive evidence that augmentation has ever occurred. This procedure is unique in these aspects, as all other types of breast implant placement do use external and often noticeable incisions in one of 3 common locations. Before detailing the TUBA approach, let's look at the more common alternatives...

Periareolar breast augmentation is the most common in the USA and in many other areas of the world. This approach uses small semi-circular incisions in the bottom of the areola to place the implant directly into the breast. This technique can be used with saline or silicone implants, although silicone will require a much longer incision and will not work well for every patient, especially those with diminutive or light colored areolae. Scarring is often visible on the lower portion of the areola and can be extremely disconcerting if the scars are prominent. Additionally, being that this technique cuts into the actual breast mound, there is increased risk for complications including nipple sensitivity issues, breastfeeding issues and infection.

Inframammary breast augmentation is very common and is performed using a crescent shaped incision placed in the breast fold, under the breast mound. This inframammary crease is located exactly where the mammary attaches to the body, under the bulk of the breast. This is the original approach to augmentation and can be used with any type of implant prosthetic. Risk of infection and breastfeeding difficulties are decreased using this approach, as is the chance for diminished nipple sensation. However, this technique also has a serious downside. First, the scars are usually the worst with this method of placing implants and will be easily noticed when looking at the underside of the breast. Worse still is the fact that cutting into the breast fold accelerates the natural degenerative processes which cause ptosis (sagging) of the breast mound. This can cause early overall breast degeneration or can result in various implant based complications including double bubble, or more commonly, bottoming out of the prosthetic.

The transaxillary breast augmentation technique was revolutionary in that it was the first approach to successfully place implants using incisions off the breast mound. This method enters the body through a fine incision in the underarm. The incision can be hidden in a natural fold, although it is still often visible years later when the axilla is exposed. This operative procedure also allows patients to reduce the chance of experiencing complications relating to breastfeeding and nipple sensitivity. The transaxillary technique does not have degenerative effects on the breast fold or other mammary tissues. This surgery can be performed using any type of implant, although it works best with saline or smaller sized silicone prostheses. The downside is the possibility of nerve damage or injury to the lymph nodes in the underarm region and a greater chance for implant migration away from the intended site of placement. Of course, the scarring is also a consideration for many women, especially dancers, models and those who often lift their arms, exposing the incision locations.

Finally, we get to TUBA. The transumbilical approach allows women to reduce all the chances for breastfeeding and sensation complications, as well as avoid damaging the breast structure or enacting noticeable scarring. However, the potential downside of the procedure is that is can currently only be utilized with saline breast implants. Additionally, the technique is not indicated in all women, since individual anatomical concerns may preclude some women as ideal candidates. However, these events are rare and most women will truly benefit from this option when considering surgical breast enlargement.

In conclusion, the transumbilical approach to breast implant placement gives women one more choice to achieve the look and feel they desire without risking many of the usual negative possibilities which are associated with more traditional prosthetic placement. I always recommend that women seek out a specialist in the TUBA technique, since there is simply no substitute for a trained hand and an experienced eye...

Eve Anderson, RN, CSW, is an expert cosmetic surgery nurse and a practicing social worker in the field of mind/body medicine. Additional information about Breast Implants and TUBA can be found on her website, Breast-Plastic-Surgery.Org.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Eve_Anderson

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Ten Plastic Surgery Procedures to Avoid in 2009

Plastic surgery has reached far beyond just a medical sub specialty. Plastic surgery is becoming pop culture with the reality TV shows and rumors of celebrities that have had cosmetic surgery. Some of the procedures that seem to get the most attention are "fringe" plastic surgery procedures.

There are a number of procedures that have an excellent track record of safety, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. In my opinion procedures like breast augmentation, abdominoplasty, face lift, blepharoplasty, and liposuction would fit into this criteria.

There are other procedures that are being done on a routine basis that are in principle at the least silly and possibly even dangerous. This is the authors current top ten list of plastic surgery procedures to avoid:

1. Lipodissolve and mesotherapy - this involves the injection of a non-standardized mix of chemicals which claims to dissolve the fat away. The amount of fat dissolved is unpredictable and usually little to none. The broken down fat cells and cholesterol are reportedly excreted as waste. There is some concern that this could deposit in the arteries leading to premature heart disease. Mostly, this is a waste of money with little proven benefit.

2. Buttock augmentation - I am not talking about correcting irregularities with fat grafts. I am talking about implants used to add buttock fullness. High risk of infection and implant complications. I think the fad will end quicker than the pain from sitting on these implants.

3. Permanent Fillers - Never, ever let anyone inject silicone into your face. Temporary fillers (Radiesse, Restylane ...) or natural fat injection is O.K.

4. Injection for Breast Augmentation - Injection of soft tissue fillers to increase the breast volume. The procedure is expensive and the duration of effect can be short lived. Risks include breast lumps that can be difficult to rule out breast cancer.

5. Transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA) - The scar for breast augmentation is almost never an issue after surgery. The scar around the belly button is visible in a bra or bikini. The revision rate is very high and the implants tend to sit too wide and move unnaturally with exercise. Silicone implants cannot be used. If a revision is required, a much longer incision on the breast is needed. This is marketing hype and has no place in breast augmentation.

6. Cosmetic Leg Lengthening Surgery - The bones in the leg are broken and lengthened over time. Actually a very rare procedure.

7. Pectoral implants - Similar to buttock implants.

8. Laser lipo or smartlipo - No proven advantage to tumescent liposuction but there are disadvantages. Disadvantages include the cost of the technology and the generally poorly trained physicians currently using this technology. Very few plastic surgeons have embraced this technology as the studies have not demonstrated advantage. This may change in the future if studies can demonstrate improved safety, efficacy or both as compared to traditional techniques.

9. Phenol peels - Very deep chemical peel that can make a patient look like a pale burn victim. There are much better alternatives including laser therapy and moderate peels such as TCA peels.

10. Physicians without proper training - This is truly most important. Pick a board certified plastic surgeon and you are on the right step. To become board certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery, a plastic surgeon must first complete intensive training in an accredited training program. Thereafter, the surgeon must pass rigorous written and oral examinations given by the board. The American Board of Plastic Surgery is one of only 24 accredited specialty boards recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and is the only board recognized by the ABMS to certify a surgeon in plastic surgery. There are a number of other boarding organizations that include "facial", "aesthetic" or "cosmetic" in the title. These are not recognized by the ABMS and do not have the same training requirements.

Contact the American Board of Plastic Surgery at (215) 587-9322 to verify a physician's board status. You may also contact the American Board of Medical Specialties at 1(800) 776-2378 or http://www.abms.org


About the Author

Dr. York Yates is a board certified Utah plastic surgeon. Offers online and in-office opinions and information about cosmetic surgery, reconstructive surgery and hand surgery. Reproduction allowed only with inclusion of author information.